Poultry and livestock farmers
declared victory on Wednesday when a federal court ruled in favor of West
Virginia poultry farmer Lois Alt in a lawsuit she brought against the
Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia ruled that contrary to EPA’s contention, ordinary
stormwater from Alt’s farmyard is exempt from National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permit requirements.
Alt filed suit against EPA in
June 2012 after the agency threatened her with $37,500 in fines each time
stormwater came into contact with dust, feathers or small amounts of manure on
the ground outside of her poultry houses as a result of normal farm operations.
EPA also threatened separate fines of $37,500 per day if Alt failed to apply
for a NPDES permit for such stormwater discharges. AFBF and the West Virginia
Farm Bureau intervened alongside Alt as co-plaintiffs to help resolve the issue
for the benefit of other poultry and livestock farmers.
“We are pleased the court
flatly rejected EPA’s arguments and ruled in favor of Lois Alt,” said AFBF
President Bob Stallman. “The outcome of this case will benefit thousands of
livestock and poultry farmers who run their operations responsibly and who
should not have to get a federal permit for ordinary rainwater from their
farmyards.”
In ordering Alt to seek a
permit, EPA took the legal position that the Clean Water Act’s exemption for
“agricultural storm water discharges” does not apply to farms classified as
“concentrated animal feeding operations” or “CAFOs,” except for areas where
crops are grown. In other words, any
areas at a CAFO farm where crops are not grown, and where particles of manure
are present, would require a permit for rainwater runoff.
In April of this year, the
federal court rejected efforts by EPA to avoid defending its position by
withdrawing the order against Alt. In
opposing EPA’s motion to dismiss, Alt and Farm Bureau argued that farmers remained
vulnerable to similar EPA orders, and the important legal issue at stake should
be resolved. The court agreed.
“This lawsuit was about EPA’s
tactic of threatening farmers with enormous fines in order to make them get
permits that are not required by law,” said Stallman. “Lois Alt was proud of
her farm and her environmental stewardship, and she stood her ground. We’re
proud to have supported her effort.”

No comments:
Post a Comment