![]() |
| AFBF President Bob Stallman |
The
American Farm Bureau Federation is sent a farm bill proposal to Capitol Hill yesterday. Approved this weekend by the AFBF Board of Directors, the proposal
offers a diverse mix of risk management and safety net tools to benefit a wide
range of farms and it saves $23 billion compared to the cost of continuing the
current program.
The
American Farm Bureau farm bill proposal helps reduce the nation’s budget
deficit, provides an adequate economic safety net for the nation’s farmers and
is based on several core policy principles, according to AFBF President Bob
Stallman.
The
Farm Bureau proposal:
- Offers farmers a choice of program options.
- Protects and strengthens the federal crop insurance program and does not reduce its funding.
- Provides a commodity title that works to encourage farmers to follow market signals rather than making planting decisions in anticipation of government payments.
- Refrains from basing any program on cost of production.
- And, ensures equity across program commodities.
Stallman
said the goal of the American Farm Bureau proposal is to provide a measure of
fairness among regions and crops, while providing each commodity sector a
workable safety net provision for farmers who grow that crop.
“Farm
policy should provide a strong and effective safety net and viable risk
management programs for farmers that do not guarantee a profit but, instead,
protect them from catastrophic occurrences,” Stallman said. “We also want to
ensure that terms of our farm programs do not affect a farmer’s decision of
which crop to plant. The program must comply with our World Trade Organization
agreements.”
Farm
Bureau supports a program that reduces complexity while allowing producers
increased flexibility to plant in response to market demand.
Farm
Bureau supports a safety net that allows farmers to purchase insurance products
to further protect individual risk. The program should be delivered by private
crop insurance companies.
We
support producers being allowed a choice of program options.
Specifically,
the AFBF proposal calls for a three-legged safety net for program crop farmers
that includes: a stacked income protection plan commonly called STAX; an
improved crop insurance program; and target prices and marketing loans. Under
the proposal, all program crop farmers would have access to the marketing loan
and crop insurance provisions and they would then select between a target price
program and STAX to round out their safety net option.
The
AFBF proposal also supports extending provisions of the STAX program for
apples, potatoes, tomatoes, grapes and sweet corn. Covering these five
specialty crops will benefit fruit and vegetable producers in 44 states.
Eventually, Farm Bureau would like to cover all crops under a STAX program in
the future.
“While
we would have liked to have provided a STAX program for all commodity programs
under the same terms as those provided to cotton last year in the Senate bill,
funding is insufficient to do so,” Stallman explained.
Because
of funding limits, AFBF is proposing modifications be made to STAX for all
eligible commodities. Those modifications would: reduce the crop insurance
premium subsidization to 70 percent from 80 percent; not offer the multiplier
option; not offer a harvest price option; allow STAX to be based on yield or
revenue at the discretion of the producer; and allow purchase only as a buy-up
policy with a 10-25 percent deductible rather than also providing for a
stand-alone policy. In addition, under the STAX program suggested by Farm
Bureau, no payments would be made until the county average revenue or yield
fell by 10 percent from the historic amount.
A
target price program for all program commodities would be available except for
cotton. Due to terms of Brazil’s WTO cotton case against the United States,
cotton farmers would likely not be eligible for a marketing loan at the current
level or any target price.
For
other crops, target price levels would be based on the marketing-year average
price from the past five years (2007 through 2011) and those projected by the
Congressional Budget Office for the next five years (2012 through 2016). To
establish the actual target prices and provide general equity across crop
sectors, these 2007-2016 average prices are reduced by 25 percent for corn and
soybeans, 15 percent for wheat and 10 percent for rice and peanuts. Wheat has
an adjustment of only 15 percent because it is produced mostly in the larger
counties, making area yields less representative of individual producer
experience and therefore less effective as a risk management tool.
The
smaller 10 percent adjustment is applied to peanuts and rice as both crops lack
insurance products that function as well as those available to the major grain
and oilseed commodities. AFBF suggests the same 10 percent loss threshold be
used to determine appropriate target price levels for rice and peanuts. The
target price will be based on 85 percent of planted acres, but not to exceed a
producer's historical base acreage. This provides a safety net more accurately
addressing the risks associated with current production decisions and
eliminates the present mismatch between payments and actual production or
market conditions. Capping the payment acres at the historical base minimizes
any potential distortion of a target price system.
The
Senate Agriculture Committee will likely begin markup of a comprehensive,
long-term farm bill this month, while the House Ag Committee is considering
moving a bill after the Senate Ag Committee completes its mark up.

No comments:
Post a Comment